Front Page    
Ottawa XPress
 
Hour.ca
 
Voir.ca
 
Classifieds



 

No new articles.
 

 

Community Garden
 

 

August 26th, 2010

August 19th, 2010

Education & Employment: Computer animation and special effects

August 12th, 2010

August 5th, 2010

July 22nd, 2010

July 15th, 2010
 
Other weeks...
 

 



News Front
 

High Bias
 
 

June 26th, 2008
Community Garden
Write a comment on this article !
Read members’ comments [1]

Katenies and Kahentinetha
Sara Falconer
 
You'd think it would make national headlines: two grandmothers arrested at a border crossing, one forced to the ground by four armed guards, the other in handcuffs, having a heart attack. But a telling silence surrounds these allegations of brutality against Mohawk women by the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA).

On June 14, Katenies and Kahentinetha, publishers of Mohawk Nation News (www.mohawknationnews.com), were crossing the border at Cornwall after a visit to family members in the United States. When it was discovered that Katenies had an outstanding warrant for allegedly "running the border" in 2003, they were forcibly pulled from the car.

Both women say that they were beaten by multiple CBSA guards. Sixty-eight-year old Kahentinetha suffered a heart attack while she was handcuffed. Her brother, a local lawyer who was crossing the border at the same time, intervened and she was taken to a hospital by ambulance.

Akwesasne, where Katenies lives, is a Kanion'ke:haka (Mohawk) community that stretches across so-called Ontario, Quebec and New York. And therein lies the problem: Many indigenous people do not recognize the jurisdiction of colonial law over their lives and territories. It's not lawlessness, but rather adhesion to a constitution and a law that is thousands of years old.

A CBSA investigator who testified against her at her July 16 bail hearing said that Katenies "has nothing but contempt for the Canadian judicial
system." He admitted that it is "not uncommon" for Mohawks to cite the lack of jurisdiction to border officials, although he called Katenies "an extreme case." The CBSA did not respond to calls for further comment.

But just as this is no isolated incident, there is little to indicate that Katenies is particularly extreme. Since 2003, she has steadfastly challenged the Canadian government to prove that it has any jurisdiction over Mohawk people or land. Despite the fact that she formally filed a motion to dismiss based on this issue in 2007, there has been no response.

"I've had no respect. No one has looked at what I've put forward," she said. "I don't see why you should incarcerate me and beat me into submission without answering my question." Against protests by the Crown, she was released into the custody of her mother, Nancy Davis, who told the court with a smile, "I'm the only one who has authority over my daughter."

Kahentinetha is now resting at home in Kahnawake. Katenies' next court date is July 14 in Cornwall. Her supporters are encouraging people to pack the courtroom.

"It's this kind of behaviour that motivated criticism of Harper's symbolic apology [for residential schools]," says Karen Cocq of No One Is Illegal Ottawa. "The Canadian state has clearly not relented in its brutal colonial assault on First Nations people in this country. It's a case of their actions speaking louder than words." Visit www.noii-ottawa.blogspot.com for updates.
 
 



Write your comment on this article!


bogus oath proves system is a fraud  
 
The woman who was brutalised must grasp the meaning of actions over words and if she shows up without putting forward her lawful excuse the word "appearance" kicks in as it means "the formal process by which one submits themselves to the jurisdiction of the court"...Blacks law dictionary 1st Edition

If she does not recognize the jurisdiction of the court and has evidence to prove her sincere belief and she has no contract with the court or consentual awareness then she better get served on the private man acting ad prosecutor and judge and clerk of the court to offer her lawful excuse for non appearance...

She may also like to ask who gave them permission to capitalize her name as if it is her name she has first say on how it is formed...

If she says nothing and shows up...then you have evidence of consent by actions...or blatantly stupid in the eyes of the Jewish lawyers who write the laws as applicable to corporate entities AKA all caps names reversed for Good measure of notice...

ignorance of the law is no excuse

Edward-Jay-Robin Belanger

June 26th, 2008


Write your comment!
please follow these guidelines

Information requested in blue will remain confidential   [privacy policy]
Please indicate your real first and last names.

First name : 
 
Last name : 
 
Your email : 
 
Confirm your email : 


Title of your comment (max. 150 characters)

 
Your comment (max. 2000 characters)

 characters remaining


 
 
 
LIMIT PER PERSON : one comment per article per member. Thank you.

Your comment will be read by our approval team and, if it is approved, will be posted on the website within 24 hours. It could also be published, along with your name, in the printed version of Xpress magazine and on any of our partner websites. In order to present the highest quality of comments, Xpress reserves the right to refuse certain submissions. Any plagiarism will entail the entire removal of the member’s profile. Xpress is not responsible for the opinions expressed by the members.


 



Subscribe
 
Report a mistake
 
Classifieds
 
Jobs at XPress
 
Contact us
 
Advertise with us
© 2006, Communications Voir inc. All rights reserved.