Front Page    
Ottawa XPress
 
Hour.ca
 
Voir.ca
 
Classifieds



 

No new articles.
 

 

Community Garden
 

 

August 26th, 2010

August 19th, 2010

Education & Employment: Computer animation and special effects

August 12th, 2010

August 5th, 2010

July 22nd, 2010

July 15th, 2010
 
Other weeks...
 

 



News Front
 

High Bias
 
 

August 23rd, 2007
High Bias
Write a comment on this article !
Read members’ comments [8]
High Bias : Archives

Why we still need Gay Pride
Richard Burnett
 
Some years ago, the term "post-gay" was coined to describe a world where Gay Pride and Gay Villages no longer matter. Well, in North America, that day is upon us.

It's not just organizations like Capital Pride here in Ottawa that are struggling, it's major Pride parades and Gay Villages in cities like Seattle and New Orleans that are redefining themselves and what it means to be gay in urban centres. Just look at the evidence.

In a widely published Associated Press story earlier this year headlined "Gay Villages disappearing," NYC author Don Reuter, researching a book on the rise and fall of a dozen U.S. gay neighbourhoods, rhetorically asks, "What makes these neighbourhoods gay? Not much."

Reuter predicts that outside New York, San Francisco and a handful of other gay meccas like Montreal, neighbourhoods with a significant gay presence will not survive - including, Reuter contends, gay communities in New Orleans, Philadelphia and Seattle.

While North American gay communities have managed to save several iconic gay bars from closing in the last couple of years - like NYC's Stonewall Inn, originally slated to close last August, 38 years after it became an international landmark following the 1969 Stonewall Riots - others like the famed Boom Boom Room in Laguna Beach are closing, while New York's famed Roxy has already closed.

The reason? Entire cities have finally become our playgrounds. But that new reality is also breeding an apathetic post-gay attitude.

Even Montreal's gay community
- whose metropolitan population Tourism Montreal estimates tops 450,000, and whose 1996 edition of their Divers/Cité Gay Pride parade is credited with giving Montreal's Gay Village the momentum it needed to become a choice international gay destination - is going through growing pains.

Last December, Divers/Cité spun off their expensive non-profit Pride parade and community day into a new, separate organization called Célébrations LGBTA Montréal because a 2004 CROP survey reported 76 per cent of festival-goers didn't attend the parade and 25 per cent of parade-goers didn't attend the rest of their weeklong festival.

As Paris-based Têtu magazine asks in its current July-August issue, "Is Gay Pride still necessary?"

It's a legit question in countries like Canada and France, and clearly Divers/Cité sees the writing on the wall.

"Pride organizations must redefine themselves or become obsolete," says Suzanne Girard, executive director and co-founder of Divers/Cité and past-president of InterPride, the International Association of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex Pride Coordinators.

In other words, since the first-ever Pride parade was held in NYC in June 1970 to commemorate the Stonewall Riots, Pride organizations - and increasingly the gay communities they serve - have become victims of the gay liberation movement's success.

How else to explain that Capital Pride is a whopping $130,000 in debt and still most gays and lesbians in Ottawa don't give a shit? How else can one explain local apathy?

So, it bears repeating, despite the growing commercialism and congestion of the Pride circuit, Pride remains a crucial stepping-stone in the coming-out process. Even Pride veterans need to know Pride still exists, even if they don't attend the parade themselves. Because, at the end of the day, our Pride parades and "gaybourhoods" remain fragile, precious and essential. They are still the only places gays and lesbians feel safely part of a majority in a world that for the most part still hates them.

Yes, it's true Ottawans live in a gay-positive city. But always remember, tolerance is not acceptance - it is hypocrisy.

So when you attend Capital Pride's parade this weekend, donate generously.
 
 



Write your comment on this article!


Gay Pride Parades are still necessary in a society that is only tolerant!  
 
All gay pride means is that homosexuals are not ashamed of whom they are, but instead they are equal to everyone else. Equality means respecting and welcoming differences. There is a phrase I learned at a labour youth conference in Toronto a few years ago, and it is that solidarity works. When people stand united against discrimination, discrimination will be defeated, and then we can start moving forward together in equality. Tolerance is not acceptance. Whites in the south tolerated blacks by letting them have their own separate drinking fountains, but that is hardly acceptance. When gay people are accepted as a part of the community, they will have things like equal marriage rights, and a gay couple holding hands in public will feel safe and comfortable. One day Gay parades will solely be a celebration of diversity, until then Gay Pride will also be a reminder that homosexuals deserve equality and acceptance by the society at large.

I'm sure there was time in our history when multicultural events and parades faced similar discrimination as Gay Pride. I'm glad we live in a country that welcomes multicultural diversity, and I'm glad we live in a country that is moving forward when it comes to gay pride. Terms like "faggot" and "queer" are used by school children and adults as an insult, and they are just as inappropriate as racial slurs like "kike", "nigger", and "spic". A tolerant society allows heterosexuals to exist without being lynched or burned at the stake, but an accepting community would make homosexuals feel safe, welcome, equal, and secure from discrimination. With acceptance comes the maturity to respect the differences of all people (regardless if you agree with those differences or not).

I understand my privilege as a heterosexual in a tolerant but often not an accepting community. That is why I support gay pride and festivities. I understand that every day is a heterosexual parade while homosexuals face discrimination.

Jason Setnyk
{1 vote}
August 28th, 2007

Equity Among Men  
 
Yes Susan Turansky, you have shown us why Gay Pride is still relevant. For too many years, gay men have been reviled by mainstream society. As you point out though, Gay Pride is about standing up and hating all men equally. It is so unfair that intolerance and prejudice should be visited upon people of a certain sexual orientation when it is properly distributed equitably to anything with a penis. Fortunately, we have strong voices such as yours advocating for the scientific study of this plague of men with a view to curing it. So now, if you find the language of "cure" familiar as the position of certain sick christian ideologues, you'll see how your post illustrates exactly why Gay Pride will be needed for years to come.

P.S. Ger Madden - you must be exceptionally hot for anyone, man or woman, to keep hitting on you after you've opened your coarse and boorish mouth. Maybe we could hook up sometime?

Qalu B'nopo

October 5th, 2007

Gay Men are a lot like Straight Men  
 
Good thing for Ger Madden he isn't a woman straight or gay. Straight men hit on women all the time without regard to those two letters of the alphabet NO. Maybe at this very moment there is some research being done on the genetic make-up of men (straight and gay) to try to figure out why they are like this.

Susan Turansky

September 28th, 2007

Hey...  
 
I have nothing against Gays at all. More Gay men out there leaves more Straight men for straight women. But when you get hit on repeatedly when you've already said "No thanks" then you would understand how much that pisses one off and in fact incites anger and hatred. Anyone here get a speeding ticket for a speed they know they actually didn't do but the condescending Cop says "I'll knock off a few KM's just to make you look good"? F**K that. Crap leaves a bad taste in your mouth so hope everyone is reading this.

Ger Madden

September 6th, 2007

Gay Pride  
 
The title of the article is Why We Still Need Gay Pride, but the only reason given is that Pride organizations are going broke. So what's the problem? The article argues itself out of its own thesis by stating that "Pride organizations...have become victims of the gay liberation movement's success." So the majority of the public is accepting of the gay community, and the gay community itself now has "entire cities as their playgounds." So, again, why do we need gay pride? Just so Pride Organizations make money, according to this article.

I understand that tolerance and acceptance are not the same thing, but hey, our neighbourhoods are still full of racists, sexists, and xenophobes. Total acceptance is not gonna happen. There will always be people who hate certain people. As long as we have laws protecting us all equally, and there is a concious effort to make minorities safe and comfortable, I'd say we're headed the right way. Parades might be an important event for the participants, and even a fun party for the casual onlooker, but I doubt very much whether they change the hearts and minds of homophobes.

If "gaybourhoods" are disappearing (but not the gay people), doesn't that suggest that integration is working? If not, one could argue that racism towards blacks is at an all time high simply because the Black Panthers are defunct. No, tolerance is not acceptance, but segregation isn't acceptance either.

Aaron Brown
{1 vote}
September 1st, 2007

Gay Pride  
 
I am not gay but look forward every year for the gay pride parade. I love the costumes, the colours and all in all the positive attitudes from everyone involved. I did not get to see this year and am sorry i did not. I really dont see what the big hoop la is all about. People express themselves in so many ways, this is just one more. Cant wait for next years. I work with many gays and have such a great time with them at work. They are funny, good listenners and just great people.

Louise Lacroix

August 31st, 2007

Tolerance & Acceptance from a Collective/Legal Standpoint  
 
Jeremy M.-C.'s response looks at tolerance vs. acceptance from the individual standpoint, but let's look at society's standpoint in general through history.

Up through the 1960s, homosexuality was simply illegal. Then in December 1967, the then Justice Minister, Pierre Elliott Trudeau declared that the state had no place in the bedrooms of the nation. After becoming Prime Minister in 1968, he de-criminalized homosexuality in 1969. It was no longer a crime to be gayl or engage in homosexual acts. At this point, with the de-criminalization, I think we can say that homosexuality was now tolerated, because it was no longer illegal.

Acceptance, of course, was still another matter.

There were still no laws protecting homosexuals from discrimination. You could be fired from your job for being homosexual, for example. The RCMP were weeding out homosexuals from the federal public service in the 1950s & 1960s for fear that communist agents blackmail them with threats of getting them jailed for being gay. After 1969, the RCMP continued to weed out homosexuals, because the communist agents could still threaten gay public servants with getting them fired for being gay.

Individual provinces began to change that with anti-discrimination laws to protect sexual orientation, beginning with Québec in 1977. Then in 1985 came the Equality section of the Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, & no one could legally be fired for being gay.

Acceptance at last? Well, yes, on the individual level. Acceptance of same sex unions, however, had to wait another 20 years. Acceptance continues to evolve for society in general, as new laws dictate.

As a footnote from Pride 2007, the transgender people (the "T" in "GLBT") are still fighting for the "acceptance" that gays now have. The only province/territory to date to protect them explicitly is the Northwest Territories (2003). Could Ontario be next? For more info, visit:

www.rainbowhealthnetwork.ca/transhealth

Brad Thomas

August 29th, 2007

Tolerance vs. acceptance  
 
Tolerance is not acceptance but rather hypocrisy?

This is an extremely harsh and wrong statement given the nature of democratic societies. One might as well say "all citizens have to like all other citizens. Period". Civil Rights are something we guarantee each other by mutual democratic tolerance and respect of each other's lifestyle, religion, etc. Acceptance is something you personally and emotionally generate for another group, or an ideology. To demand that all citizens generate an emotional acceptance to all other groups seems to me to be not what real democratic virtue is about. It seems to police the actual thoughts of people.

Not to say that we should NOT be accepting of all lifestyles. Of course that's the goal. But that's not what guarantees rights and equalities for minority groups. And you seem to be crapping all over exactly the kind of virtue that democratic civil rights should extol. Tolerance in every sense. I'm simply stating the obvious - you can't force people to like you.

Jeremy Mesiano-Crookston
{1 vote}
August 23rd, 2007


Write your comment!
please follow these guidelines

Information requested in blue will remain confidential   [privacy policy]
Please indicate your real first and last names.

First name : 
 
Last name : 
 
Your email : 
 
Confirm your email : 


Title of your comment (max. 150 characters)

 
Your comment (max. 2000 characters)

 characters remaining


 
 
 
LIMIT PER PERSON : one comment per article per member. Thank you.

Your comment will be read by our approval team and, if it is approved, will be posted on the website within 24 hours. It could also be published, along with your name, in the printed version of Xpress magazine and on any of our partner websites. In order to present the highest quality of comments, Xpress reserves the right to refuse certain submissions. Any plagiarism will entail the entire removal of the member’s profile. Xpress is not responsible for the opinions expressed by the members.


 



Subscribe
 
Report a mistake
 
Classifieds
 
Jobs at XPress
 
Contact us
 
Advertise with us
© 2006, Communications Voir inc. All rights reserved.